Michelle Bachman’s Entangling Alliance
Posted by Anthony Gregory on June 27, 2011
Presidential candidate and Tea Party heroine Michelle Bachman sure knows how to rile up the red-state base. Talk up the threat of socialism. Praise the Constitution. Even criticize the Federal Reserve a little bit. And this is all well and good.
But she holds at least one position that is at complete odds with the principles on which the United States was founded, a position that has nothing at all to do with the ideals of the Founding Fathers and Constitution.
Thomas Jefferson and George Washington warned about the danger of permanent and entangling alliances. The United States, as John Quincy Adams put it, goes not abroad, in search of monsters to destroy. She is the well-wisher to the freedom and independence of all. She is the champion and vindicator only of her own.”
In her recent video, Bachman takes a very different position. She says that America’s “alliance with Israel is critical for both nations at all times.”
This is a deeply unAmerican sentiment, and you don’t have to be the least bit anti-Israeli to recognize this. For she is saying the alliance with Israel is permanent and unmoving, that what is in Israel’s interests is the same as what is in the United States’s interests. Even more troubling, she explicitly conflates the two countries in terms of their national identities:
“Israelis and Americans are two sides of the same coin. We share the same values and the same aspirations. We even share the same exceptional mission—to be a light to the nations. After all, the image of America as the Shining City on the Hill is taken from the Book of Isiah.”
This is bizarre, at the very least. Could you imagine a prominent politician getting away with saying this about another country, even one as culturally similar as Great Britain? “Two sides of the same coin”? This video, an attack on Obama for being insufficiently pro-Israel, is essentially arguing that most Americans, unlike the president, recognize that the Israeli nation and the American nation are one and the same.
Indeed, the next line, about how Americans and Israelis supposedly have “the same values and the same aspirations,” is also troubling for anyone who thinks the U.S. should look after its own interests first and foremost. But aside from the objections on America-First grounds, consider the collectivism here, as well as the strange notion that Israelis in particular have the same values. We need not be the slightest bit disparaging of Israelis to see this is not the case—but it is especially ironic coming from someone who claims to defend limited government and free enterprise. After all, Israel is not a capitalist paradise. It is a welfare state. It is more domestically socialist, probably, than the Democrats in the United States. Its militarism and police state might inspire confidence in the Republicans who typically but inconsistently want to defend economic liberty but champion an interventionist military and law enforcement regime. But even by confused Republican standards, Israel is not some sort of paragon of Reagan conservatism, however defined.
And this doesn’t touch on the religious implications of her video. Of course, Christians have long been attacked for speaking their faith in the political and public spheres, and this is a disgrace. Religious conservatives have been demonized by the secular media. Yet when it comes to foreign policy and the actual governmental agenda of the U.S. executive branch, Jefferson was right that there should be a wall of separation between church and state. Madison, the author of the Constitution, was right when he said that religion and government “will both exist in greater purity, the less they are mixed together.” The whole notion of determining the proper stance of the United States in international affairs on some lines from the Old Testament should frighten even the most devoutly Christian or Jewish, for war and government are not the proper means of salvation. Those who who oppose theocracy as well as those who want America to pursue a foreign policy free of permanent, entangling alliances – both groups of whom should include all patriotic Americans — can’t help but cringe at the sight of Bachman’s video.
-
Ken
-
Omajena
-
Waveblastr
-
Charlie D
-
Retrd4good
-
Blockice
-
William Gruhn
-
Jim
-
F. MICHAEL RUSSO JR.
-
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_RV4UX3FC2DZCQGMIGFMEQQL76Q Sasha Lemure
-
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_RV4UX3FC2DZCQGMIGFMEQQL76Q Sasha Lemure
-
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_2FT3VHN6DN2FDO6TIG5WD5GUJQ Mad Dog
-
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_2FT3VHN6DN2FDO6TIG5WD5GUJQ Mad Dog
-
Anonymous
-
http://www.facebook.com/people/Nancy-Spencer/1322992435 Nancy Spencer
-
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_VMN2HEG32DC4TAXGR3YP7BMAX4 Ged
-
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/paleolibertarians/ RP McCosker
-
F. MICHAEL RUSSO JR.
-
http://profiles.google.com/csturmer Corey Sturmer
-
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_3QDGYRXGKV44USP7THOSVEQVBM netwalker
-
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_3QDGYRXGKV44USP7THOSVEQVBM netwalker
-
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_3QDGYRXGKV44USP7THOSVEQVBM netwalker
-
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/paleolibertarians/ RP McCosker
-
Cyrus
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous

